The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Portland from 1950 to 2007.
Displayed in the diagram is the improvement of Portland, which is located in a coastal area during the period from 1950 to 2007.
Overall, on the south of the city, there was more significant difference than that on the north of Portland whereas the main road was extended over the period given.
With regard to the bottom of the coastal town, It was covered by grassland in 1950, but some buildings altered them in 2007. Particularly, a cinema was constructed on the corner of the south-west, which was opposite of two ranges of houses in the south-east of Portland. Rows of shops were built two sides of the main road and in front of both cinema and houses.
Next to grassland, there was an industrial area on the west of Portland and car park on the east of this town, just as the sea was located in the top of the coastal town. In 2007, park, swimming pool and multi-storey car park replaced the industrial area whereas apartments were constructed on the other side of the sea. Finally, the road around the sea established at the end of the period linked with the main road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-12 | thuyduong896 | 73 | view |
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010. 78
- In the modern world It is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. 67
- The information below gives detail about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2011 and 2013. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, whereas, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54871794872 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53861175417 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4545078266 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19312197117 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995456999296 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129046452685 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161649637796 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154211377543 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.