The information below gives detail about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2011 and 2013.
Displayed in the table is the number of total income and expenditure on food and clothes by an average family in a city of The United Kingdom whereas the pie chart compares details about spending on food and clothes which are divided five categories in 2010 and 2013.
Overall, the salary of a family in 2013 was lower than the figure for 2010 which opposed to the trend of the expenditure on food and clothes while the money for food was consumed more than clothes over the period given.
In 2010, the average income of a family was £29000, and they spent nearly half of their salary on food and clothes. Particularly, the expenditure on meat and fish made up a quarter, which was higher than clothes 3%. Subsequently, 20% was the figure for fruits and vegetables, which was followed by dairy products and other food and drinks with 15% and 18% respectively.
The year 2013 was seen a slight decrease in total income to £25000 while a family spent £15000 on food and clothes. In detail, fruits and vegetables, which was prioritized expenditure, accounted for 35%. The percentage of meat and fish and clothes in 2013 felt significantly with 15% and 12% in order whereas the figure for other food and drinks remained stable over the period given.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | thuyduong896 | 67 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money donated in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 67
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 73
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 73
- some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '£29000'.
Suggestion: £29000
...010, the average income of a family was £ 29000, and they spent nearly half of their sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '£25000'.
Suggestion: £25000
...en a slight decrease in total income to £ 25000 while a family spent £ 15000 on food an...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '£15000'.
Suggestion: £15000
... income to £ 25000 while a family spent £ 15000 on food and clothes. In detail, fruits ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... remained stable over the period given.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66216216216 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51120773183 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459459459459 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.9161215203 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.375 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252801366814 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122043803268 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105805915916 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189328997343 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108071024115 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.