some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In contemporary society, the government invests both money and time to protect wild animals. Some people contend that they should use this money for the human population, which is more significant. In my viewpoint, the government needs to balance two issues, therefore, I disagree with this idea.
On the one hand, the states prioritize expenditure on the population of human owing to these reasons. The first reason is that there are many negative consequences but for increasing density. It results in lack of food, clothes on a daily basis. The famine of Viet Nam in 1945 was very terrible, as a specific example. In addition to that, the young population is also a serious problem in developing countries, which leads to unemployment and high inflation. While most people in a country are from 18 to 28 years old, it is easier to perceive the shortage of career and the increased cost of all services.
On the other hand, the protection of endangered species must be high on the agenda of every individual citizen and government. Firstly, it impacts on the ecosystem. As long as the biodiversity declined remarkably, the weather will have negative changes. For example, the winter is shorter, just as the summer is longer because the temperature of the earth is higher and higher. Moreover, forests cannot develop without some wild animals. The activities of these animals such as eating leaves, flowers and fruits help trees to grow up.
To conclude, I disagree with the view expressed in the statement. The investments about time and money for wild animals and human population to protect them have many advantages, so the governments need to contribute huge forces for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-13 | Huy Vu | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | buiminhduc | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | buiminhduc | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | buiminhduc | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-22 | thuyduong896 | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Portland from 1950 to 2007. 73
- In the modern world It is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- The information below gives detail about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2011 and 2013. 67
- Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations? 61
- The table shows the amount of money donated in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.025 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80878496136 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5960375354 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7647058824 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2207884277 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549300896491 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068818599517 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139216523278 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106923330323 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.