The diagram below shows the plan of a library in 2001 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pictures illustrate various changes in the ground floor in a library over the period of 8 years up to 2009.
In general, what stands out from the two pictures is that there were extensive changes with regard to the introduction of more shelves for many kinds of books there. It is clear to see that the newspapers and periodicals shelf changed considerably with the replacement of films and DVDs one.
Looking at the plan, two computers were bought and set up in the left of this library. In the meantime, the shelves of self help and history books which were located at the right were demolished to make way for 6 other shelves, namely history, fiction, self help, kitchen, economics and law. Meanwhile, the fiction shelf at the top was replaced by the children’s books one and added one area for kids to play.
The librarian’s desk and the entrance still remained stable. Besides that, 8 tables which were located in the centre of the library were replaced by 4 bigger tables in the plan in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The line graph below provide the information about the incomes of four restaurants in a city in 2010 67
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, look, still, while, in general, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67597765363 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52768448422 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0304764779 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0624101469957 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0283490974906 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348926883669 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0457694919474 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330972503279 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.