THE DIAGRAM BELOW SHOWS A POSSIBLE FUTURE MEANS OF HOME ENERGY PRODUCTION.
The diagram given illustrates how to produce electricity at home in the future.
Overall, the process includes a series of stages beginning with accumulating leaves, food scraps, etc... and water in a steel tank and culminating in the electricity generated.
In particular, compost and water are stored in an underground steel tank before experiencing the decomposition and turning into compost ferments methane gas. Then, the gas runs through pipes that lead to the methane gas storage connected with a compressor. After that, the gas is compressed out and reaches the combustion engine which turns the gas into mechanical energy. Next, it is sent to the generator and becomes electrical energy. Ultimately, it goes to the electrical energy storage called battery and ready to be used for household consumption.
In conclusion, electricity can be produced at home with a sophisticated system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
- The use of mobile phones has increases dramatically in recent years What are the positive and negative effects of this 78
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 11
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44078947368 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07849046317 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644736842105 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3651237892 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0544370315232 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0240453234194 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424753353007 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0482959265591 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521017241875 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.68 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.