The diagram below shows the process for making a water clock. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. Write at least 150 words.
The figure illustrates how to set up a water clock. Overall, there are seven steps in the whole process which involves a faucet, a stand attaching two plastic bottles one of which has a hole at its bottom as well as another hole on its side near its neck area and the other bottle has its neck cut off.
In the first stage, the faucet would be turn on to drip water into the first bottle which is taped at the top part of the stand. Then, fingers should be used to cover the bottom hole, so that water can fulfil the bottle. When the water is full up to the side hole which is glued with a straw, this straw would keep the water from overflowing and help it to maintain at a constant level.
Next, fingers should be moved away to let the water drop into the second bottle which is put at the bottom of the stand. At this stage, the second bottle can be marked with pens at levels of water after one minute or two minutes of dripping. When the second bottle is full of water, it can be emptied and the whole process can start over again to time things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-19 | mifas meleraroth | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- For centuries, important parts of education have remained such as reading, writing and maths. With the advent of computers, some people think that computer skill be made as a fourth skill to be added to the list. To what extent do you agree? (IELTS Academ 67
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works 69
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.1359223301 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.87220115044 2.65546596893 71% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519417475728 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4971329521 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926007444835 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509560996635 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0171444127502 0.0843802449381 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676574209299 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010861991232 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.03 11.4140731707 62% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.