The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? (IELTS Academic Test, 2017)
Science plays a leading role in our modern society today for a reason that scientific breakthroughs can pave the way for many other developments in numerous fields such as medicine, technology, agriculture, politics etc. With this, I do agree that the government should spend more funding on science education.
Firstly, the benefits of learning about science are enormous for youngster. Since science involves in all aspects of our lives, teaching science would help young learners understand much more about the world around them and the way everything works like where the rain comes from or why volcanoes erupt. By these knowledge, they can find answers for questions emerging from their curiosity by themselves. In the long run, this would gain them more confidence and more creativity in which their minds can produce interesting ideas that are actually able to solve existent social problems such as waste recycling, pollution, energy saving and so on. In addition, science also inspires students with other subjects. Even a single scientific equipment can liven up a topic and make it easier for them to engage with it.
Secondly, science also trains teenagers for life skills as problem-solving, researching, analysing, patience. These skills would certainly assist them to better encounter incidents coming up in their lives. On the plus side, early scientific education would give the juvenile a finer preparation and a clearer orientation for future careers.
In summary, science education for school attendants helps them become smarter and more proactive learners, develops important life skills and provides them with a proper instruction for future careers as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | wardiati | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | ziaul1891 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | ziaul1891 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | ajayjain831 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Sai sushma | 56 | view |
- The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 69
- People are wasting a lot of food these days What causes it and what solutions are possible 59
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? (IELTS Academic Test, 2017) 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...e, technology, agriculture, politics etc.. With this, I do agree that the governme...
^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...n comes from or why volcanoes erupt. By these knowledge, they can find answers for questions em...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 762, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngle scientific equipment can liven up a topic and make it easier for them to eng...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45419847328 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76793356294 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660305343511 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2060123722 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.083333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185878800239 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746604169156 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688703508913 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122889546276 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677868563723 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.