The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to ealier stages to enable adjustment.
The flow chart reveals the information about the specific stages of consumer goods manufactured by company, and its also include the process of fed back to stages of adjustment.
To begin with, the process of production start with the collection of raw material and manufacturing components. After this, the material is to be stored. On the other hand, the next step is to research of product, and as well as design of good is set in this process. Moving forward, the next stage is to prepare the planning of the production. After that, the next stages are assembling and goods inspected by the company.
After the inspection, the other step is to testing the good as well as the design of product is always rechecked. Moreover, the next stage of the manufacturing process the packaging of goods are down here and despatch respectively. Therefore, the goods are ready for sale. In that process, the another one concept is include the market research for advertisement for increasing the sale of goods and as well as the finished goods qre again test in the design section.
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of the company. What can comapnies do to increase staff pruduction? 56
- A recent survey shows the number of people traveling through London's underground station boarding Victoria terminal at different times of the day. 78
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in aunual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Some people says that computer games are bad for children by all means others believe that these games are contributing to children development. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he company. After the inspection, the other step is to testing the good as wel...
^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'included'.
Suggestion: included
...hat process, the another one concept is include the market research for advertisement f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86413043478 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77907703022 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505434782609 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.2903717111 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277201244716 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109851506354 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112342056282 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231626766328 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131437322087 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.