The diagram demonstrates various stages undertaken in order to design a trade show over the course of two years.
The diagram demonstrates various stages undertaken in order to design a trade show over the course of two years.
Overall, as can be seen, the layout experienced significant changes ranging from eliminating a conference hall and meeting room to constructing an exhibition area and a new conference hall.
Looking at the graph, it is clear that the location of the side and main entrance did not change, however, refreshment replaced with registration. By 2010, the meeting room had omitted and the conference hall had decreased in terms of its seats and relocated with an exhibition area. In 2010, exhibition area seats incremented three times compared with 2009 and situated instead of the conference hall and meeting room. Finally, the trade show floor used to have a balcony only in 2009, which was ran throughout the layout behind the registration, but in 2010 a lounge area is added to it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-10 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 56 | view |
- The table compares social and economic factors based on the United Nation (UN) statistics in four nations, namely Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1994. 84
- It is true to say that in the new millennium people pay too much attention to monetary things 89
- The pie charts compare the proportion of monthly household income allocated for different things in low income and high-income members of a European nation. 89
- The pie charts demonstrate the proportion of time spent by adolescents and senior citizens on the world wide web. 89
- The bar chart compares the proportion of owned and rented dwellings in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'run'.
Suggestion: run
... have a balcony only in 2009, which was ran throughout the layout behind the regist...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03355704698 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85792585486 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644295302013 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9493932235 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221480824181 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177550241924 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.368582815011 0.0843802449381 437% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342790773634 0.15604864568 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.464861429219 0.0819641961636 567% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.