The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.
The two maps compare the layout of a school in 2004 with the design for its development 20 years later.
It is clear that the plan for 2024 includes the addition of new buildings to accommodate a larger number of students.
In 2004, there were 2 school buildings separated by a path leading to a huge sports field for 600 students. By 2024, it is predicted that there will be more 400 students attending the school, so the third building will have been constructed to meet their needs. It will replace the site of the original sports field, next to a new car park erected to the east. Therefore, a smaller sports field will need to be rebuilt, dominating the area of trees.
Additionally, a shorter path will be created to link 2 initial buildings, blocking the long way from the main entrance to the third school buildings. Instead of it, a new road to the second car park will also spring up, which makes it more convenient for students to move their vehicles from the entry. Finally, there are no changes in the location of the original car park and the main entrance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, second, so, therefore, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57216494845 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49997874367 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9745549522 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215323928453 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835169277367 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538364857431 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1274419394 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345687847779 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.