The diagrams below show the stages of the erosion of the headland

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the stages of the erosion of the headland

Given are the diagrams delineating the process in the erosion of the headland. It is perceptible that there is a slow vanish of the headland because of the eroside.
The most prominent of modifications has been the disappearance of the big ledge for a long time after a demolition of waves. At the first time, there is a continuous attack of waves on the base of the cliff which has the weakest area. Following that, the more attacks, the larger cracks appeared into the cliff from time to time.
Another transformation is that the big cave has been become visible from the cracks of the ledge. The eroside is continuing until the cave changes into the arch which undercut through the headland. This arch is truly like the Durdle Door in Dorset.

Strikingly, the birth of the gigantic collapse of the arch’s roof because of a weaker base of the cliff when it becomes a steak. Moreover, this steak is continually eroded until it is only a smaller one. Ultimately, a big headland has been retreating a stack standing independently besides the headland in the interim.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-21 nobitaa 73 view
2024-12-20 khanhkhanhlhp 78 view
2024-12-11 nguyendangquang.aspect 11 view
2024-12-08 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
2024-11-29 Nguyen Thinh 84 view
Essays by user Emma1998 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the diagrams delineating the process in...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77956989247 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74647000128 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543010752688 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3436717981 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.8181818182 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124369399936 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567768423421 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987518935201 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995189454631 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111121857276 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.