Different kinds of energy in France
The two pie charts compares the percentage of energy generation in France in the timescale of 10 years from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, The percentage of coal and gas production topped the list, compared to other types of energy. The findings of chart also reveals these kinds of energy witnessed an upward trend of production, with exception of petroleum.
Look at the pie chart for more details, we can see the rate of coal produced in 2005 constituted 30.93%, which was 1,13% higher than that in 1995. A similar proportion of increase was seen in gas generation, accounting for 29.63% ( in 1995) to 30.31% (in 2005). Although nuclear and other sources of energy took up much less percentage in the chart, with 6.4% and 4.9%, respectively, it experienced a significant increase in 2005.
The striking feature in these charts was that the share of petro generation plunged over the surveyed period, dropping by roughly 10% from 29.27% in 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view | |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 11
- Many animals are being hunted to the brink of extinction in order to fulfill the demand and greed of mankind for decorative purposes as well as for other reasons such as traditional medicine.How could this be solved. 67
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in gas generation, accounting for 29.63% in 1995 to 30.31% in 2005. Although nucl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91823899371 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67556661265 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4108210015 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113183603585 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054870757641 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069476641775 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775261632397 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646590811443 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.