The presented bar chart illustrates the changes of divorce rates in terms of percentage in two countries Finland and Sweden within a timespan of 5 years.
As is observed, the ratio in Finland saw a ceiling trend whereas this figure in Sweden had a downward tendency over the same period, and there was also an oscillation in both countries. Despite having a lower rate at the beginning, Finland surpassed Sweden at the end of the period.
The ratio of divorce in Sweden was nearly 45%, about 8% higher than Finland in 2011. The rate rocketed and reached the highest peak over the period in 2012 at almost 50%. Nevertheless, this figure witnessed a slight drop to 47% in 2013 then continued to decline stably to the end of the period, slumped to approximately 45% in 2014 and saw a freefall to around 37% in 2015.
On the contrary, divorce rates in Finland started with a less percentage in 2011 at about 38% and this was followed by a 5% deterioration to around 33% in 2012. After that, the ratio underwent a steady growth for the last part of the period. This figure surged noticeably to just under 40% in 2013, at which point it rose to around 41% in 2014 and remained static for the next year, finally outraced the rate of Sweden.
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 82
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problem and instead of increase funding into urgent and more threatening issue such as global warming To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea and make comparisons where appropriate 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 61
- the illustrations show how chocolate is produced 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, nevertheless, so, then, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54708520179 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52668200233 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569506726457 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3603704754 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389331143042 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169057546163 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127683886507 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269565605363 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664323240186 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.