The bar chart demonstrates the amount of money spent on three different categories of fast food by income groups in the UK in 1990.
Overall, while the low income preferred the fish and chips in 1990, the remaining groups consumed the hamburger the most. Generally, people in the high income group tended to spend more their budgets on fast food.
In terms of the hamburger, the biggest expenditure was contributed by the high income group, at roughly 42 pence per week, while the low income ate this kind of fast food at least, at only 14 pence per week. Additionally, the average group spent approximately 32 pence per week on the hamburger.
In 1990, the group which had the highest expenditure on the fish and chips was the average group, at precisely 25 pence, however, both the high and low income groups only set aside around 17 pence per week for this category of fast food. Besides, nearly 19 pence was spent on the pizza by the high income, compared with 12 and 7 pence of the average and low income groups, respectively.
- The map describes the change of a park from 1980 to now 68
- The charts show the percentage of peple working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 80
- The plan below shows a typical American and Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, while, at least, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47720052483 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513661202186 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5927751692 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445470323551 0.215688989381 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227702064011 0.103423049105 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132625625383 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316037691151 0.15604864568 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844732686693 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.