The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant

The bar chart compares the average number of pupils in a class between six nations and the world in 2006.
Overall, it is clear that South Korea had the biggest class size in 2006, while the nations had the smallest class size were Denmark and Iceland at the same time. Besides, the number of students in a class had a significant change between the primary school and lower secondary school.
In terms of the primary school, while South Korea and Japan had the same size of class in 2006, at aroud 31 students per class, each class in the UK and Mexico included merely 25 students in 2006. Additionally, each class in Denmark and Iceland was responsible for 28 pupils, which was lower than the world average, at 29.
Following this, in the lower secondary schools, the average number of students per class in South Korea was the highest in 2006, at 41, which was higher than that of Mexico and Japan, at 34 and 33, respectively. Nevertheless, the figures of these three nations were higher than the average of world, at precisely 20. In the same year, the figure of the UK was 14, which was still higher than the world average. In contrast, the lowest figures were in Denmark and Iceland, at 19 and 14, respectively, which were lower than the world average.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61777777778 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35393655054 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422222222222 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4999609314 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208673277786 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107472665229 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801426179823 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172563088544 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654183437536 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61777777778 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35393655054 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422222222222 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4999609314 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208673277786 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107472665229 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801426179823 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172563088544 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654183437536 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

The provided column chart illustrates the average numbers of students in the two types of classes in various countries, which compared with the world average.
At first glance, while four out of six countries had the same trend of data with the figure for the world average, the numbers of students at primary schools was higher than those at lower secondary schools in the UK and Iceland.
It is noticeable that South Korean contributed the largest gap to the data of class size between 8-14-year students (over 40 students) and 5-8-year students (nearly 30 students) among these countries. Likewise, the Mexican primary-school class size stood at the larger part of pupils than the lower secondary schools, at roughly 8 students. Also, the number of Japanese and Denmark students at the age of 8-14, which formed about 33 and 17 students respectively, was just over two students higher than the class size of students aged from 5 to 8.
Looking at the column in more detail, we can see that there were insignificant gaps between two groups of students in the UK and Iceland, which had the contrast trend in comparison with the detail of the world. Indeed, there was a 1-student gap only belonged to the difference between the class size of students in group of 5-8 and 8-14 in the UK and Iceland