The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from this energy use.
The first pie chart illustrates the energy consumption for a variety of purposes, the second indicates how much greenhouse gas is emitted for them by an average Australian family.
Overall, while Australian family spend the majority their energy on heating and water heating, and the most greenhouse gas emission come from water heating and other appliances. Another key figure is that cooling and lighting account for the lowest percentage in both or charts.
Looking at the first chart, energy consumption for heating is the largest use of energy, at 42%. The figure for water heating is 12%, less than but higher than the remaining sections. Other appliances consume another 15%, which is roughly twice as high as the percentage of energy used for the refrigeration. The proportion of energy consumed for lighting and cooling are both very small, at 4% and 2% respectively.
In term of greenhouse gas released, water heating is the major cause, at 32%. By contrast, the figure for cooling is 3%, which is the lowest percentage of the total. The number for refrigeration, lighting and other appliances account for 14%, 8% and 28% accordingly, which nearly double by comparison to the amount of used energy. However, there is an inverse proportion in the figure for heating to the aforementioned sections, with only 15%, which nearly less than triple the level of used energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-04 | mylinh3001 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | mylinh3001 | view | |
| 2023-08-04 | mylinh3001 | view | |
| 2023-08-04 | mylinh3001 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-17 | nguyenthanhloc | 56 | view |
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emission per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1976 and 2007 56
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emission per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1976 and 2007 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people can buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08370044053 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76722121359 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515418502203 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.228975208 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.909090909 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240924067012 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981753687495 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842940908283 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172404719587 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710761100753 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.