The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chary shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from the energy use.
The pie charts given illustrated the proportion of the energy consuming and greenhouse emissions producing in australian households. To sum up, it is clear that, heating, water heating and other appliances were responsible for the largest proportions of energy consuming and greenhouse gas emission producing in australian household.
The first diagram provided shows the percentage of five activities in the australian household that consumed energy. The heating accounted for the most significant proportion of Australia household energy consuming which is more than two-fifths. Followed by water heating and refrigerator contributed for 30% and 15% each. The remaining energy consuming (refrigerator, lighting, and cooling) shared the small number of the proportion.
The second figure shown indicates the percentage of five activities in the australian household that produced greenhouse gas emission. water heating and other appliances shared the biggest percentage of greenhouse gas emission producing (32% and 28%). Furthermore, heating accounted less than a fifth and the three remaining activities (refrigeration, lighting and cooling) contributed the small proportion on australian greenhouse gas emission.
- The world has seen an enormous increase in flights for leisure, business, and commercial purposes around the world over recent years. What do you think are the main advantages and disadvantages of such flights?Do you think flights should be taxed more? 61
- The governments' investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red the small number of the proportion. The second figure shown indicates the pe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Water
... that produced greenhouse gas emission. water heating and other appliances shared the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'activities'' or 'activity's'?
Suggestion: activities'; activity's
...ss than a fifth and the three remaining activities refrigeration, lighting and cooling con...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11695906433 4.92477711251 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16334811778 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508771929825 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0495164161 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247834533877 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113799972368 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607606737646 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177021812643 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313498906894 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 11.4140731707 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.