The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart provided illustrates how many gram of four different type of meats ware consumed by people in Europe nation per week from 1979 to 2004. Overall, it is evident that the consuming of chicken saw an increase during the period, meanwhile three other kind of meats (beef, lamb, and fish) experienced downward trend.
Generally, chicken was unpopular consumed-meat by European people in initial year. it stood at around 140 in 1979. This number was much smaller compare meat from cow and sheep. however, the figure increased steadily in a decade and surpassed the number of eaten-beef in 1998 (approximately 210). Afterward, the trend fluctuated before it reached the highest figure at around 260, and ending the period with 250 gram.
beef, however, started the period as the highest number of eaten-meat (approximately 220). The figure witnessed fluctuation between 1979 and 1984. On the next three years (1985 – 1987) beef consumption was flat at around 235 gram. Following that, the consumption of beef decreased dramatically to roughly 100 gram at the end of reported year. Furthermore, the remaining meat consumptions (lamb and fish) saw a decrease trend during the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Lovepreet123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anasrafiq | 73 | view |
- The tables below give the information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 67
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 56
- The graph and table below show the changes in the number of overseas visitors and top 5 visitor countries to Britain in 2004 and 2005. 73
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 61
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun gram seems to be countable; consider using: 'many grams'.
Suggestion: many grams
...The line chart provided illustrates how many gram of four different type of meats ware co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...uring the period, meanwhile three other kind of meats beef, lamb, and fish experienc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...eat by European people in initial year. it stood at around 140 in 1979. This numbe...
^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...maller compare meat from cow and sheep. however, the figure increased steadily in a dec...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...und 260, and ending the period with 250 gram. beef, however, started the period a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Beef
...and ending the period with 250 gram. beef, however, started the period as the hig...
^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...beef consumption was flat at around 235 gram. Following that, the consumption of bee...
^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...f decreased dramatically to roughly 100 gram at the end of reported year. Furthermor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18229166667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73595192624 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645833333333 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1206964784 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9166666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140771727333 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553038952281 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350786804868 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101023385035 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319304193903 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.