The first pie chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household.The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts below illustrate how energy is utilized in an average Australian household and radiation of greenhouse gas as a consequence of this energy use.
Generally speaking, most of the Australian household energy was used in heating while in greenhouse gas emission, maximum portion was invested in water heating. However, in both the cases, cooling, lighting and heating involved least portion and considerable amount in other appliances.
Australian household energy comprised 42% heating and 32 % water heating. On the other hand, in terms of green house gas emission, amount of energy used in heating significantly decreased to 15% and water heating slightly increased to 32%. When added together, both of them made up just above three quarters of the total energy. Addtionally, household energy regarding to other appliances is accounted for 15% which expanded to just above a quarter in greenhouse gas emissions.
On contrary, refrigeration, lighting and cooling included 7%, 4%, 2% of the total energy respectively. In terms of green house secretion, the energy contributed to refrigeration declined to half whereas cooling and lighting utilized the energy by increasing to 3% and 8% successively. On the whole, energy used in these three catagories experienced expansion slightly more than a quarter in greenhouse radiations.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects which interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs 79
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurents between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 63
- Levels of consumer debt are increasing across the world To address this a new subject should be introduced in secondary school how to manage personal finances Discuss and give your opinion 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, whereas, while, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54589371981 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07728363272 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545893719807 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5201390495 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292060696898 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124185389359 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125017623817 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217848457553 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143963624349 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.