the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment.

The diagram shows the trampling process, which is the way that tourist walking in the countryside affects the quality of soil and vegetation. At the first stage, vegetation's quality is damaged as a consequence of walking, leading to the degradation of plants and the reduction of their reproduction and growth. The result is a significant decrease in plant cover that will cause erosion and decreased quality of soil and vegetation.
On the other hand, soil quality is decreased as it became compacted by the amount of foot traffic. A Compacted soil contains less air and waters which impact the process of growth and reproduction of plants, also it has less rate of water infiltration and drainage that leads of runs off. Runs-off and soil erosion causes substantial on-sites problems like the reduction of vegetation. the process finally results in endangering soil condition and plants coverage in the countryside.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...blems like the reduction of vegetation. the process finally results in endangering ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23648648649 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93086737411 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6327673083 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0500988296552 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290007991587 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710371600718 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0467262459119 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467262459119 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.