Given are two pie charts displaying the categories of the annual spending divided by families in Canada between 1972 and 2002.
A glance at two pie charts gave the change of the expenditure in Canadian family annually between 1972 and 2002.
The main household expenditures in Canada were Foods and Cars in both 1972 and 2002, but both two items went toward different trends. The rest categories were smaller, included Furniture, Petrol, Restaurants, Books and Computers, thus the proportion changed slightly in the past thirty years.
According to the data, the families in Canada annually took much money on Cars and foods from 1972 to 2002, over half of spending were used on Cars and Food in a year. The rate of Food was 39%-the highest spending in 1972, but dramatically dropped to 14% in 2002; whereas the spending of Car noticeably soared from 22% to 40% and hit the highest level among all the categories in 2002. In addition, the items of Computers and Restaurants had upward trends from 3% to 11% and 8% to 14%; the item of Petrol, Furniture and Books followed downward trends from 10% to 9%, 11% to 9% and 7% to 3%, respectively.
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system 87
- The graph beside shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000. 73
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system. 73
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 84
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '39%-the the highest'.
Suggestion: 39%-the the highest
...nd Food in a year. The rate of Food was 39%-the highest spending in 1972, but dramatically drop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73595505618 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59076492003 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.5 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.5 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310449825642 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156924873448 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130449928758 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237410251503 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11954115904 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.