The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The line graph illustrates the quantity of waste created by Company A, Company B and Company C during the period between 2000 and 2015. It can be seen that, generally, Company A and B showed a downward trend in waste while the quantity of waste made by Company C continued rising throughout the period.
The waste crated by Company A decreased slightly from 12 tonnes in 2000 to 8 tonnes in 2015. On the contrary, both Company B and C sustained a growing quantity of waste until 2005. Company B created approximately 10 tonnes in 2005 then significantly declined year by year, reaching a lowest level of 3 tonnes in 2015. The quantity made by Company C continued climbed and peaked 12 tonnes in 2015. During 15 years, the waste made by company C jumped to the largest quantity. While the Company A and B showed a trend of the waste reduction, Company C displayed a stable growth and hit the highest level. Finally, the waste made by Company C is almost equal to the amount of Company A and B.
It’s interesting to note that Company A, B and C experienced three different trends of the amount of waste. It’s possible to speculate all the companies will continued to figure out how to reduce more waste, due to the waste reduction is one of the important environmental protection index.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | shell | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Evelyn_Han | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
- The graph beside shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000. 73
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015. 67
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...icantly declined year by year, reaching a lowest level of 3 tonnes in 2015. The q...
^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'continue'
Suggestion: continue
...ble to speculate all the companies will continued to figure out how to reduce more waste,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6652173913 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76003410844 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4153629642 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5454545455 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334782386488 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149770082787 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792700476968 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226985750491 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668548463803 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.