The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010

The given line graph illustrates the proportions of travelers to Scotland who visited four different fascinations over the period of 30 years
What stands out from the line graph is that while the Festival and Aquarium had a downward trend, Castle and Zoo witnessed an opposite trend during the same period. In addition, the figure of Zoo had the most oscillation
In 1980, starting at 30%, the percentage of Festival was the highest after that this figure witnessed a period of a substantial plunge to about less than two-fifths in 2010. It was Aquarium that had 20% in 1980. After touching the highest point in 1985, Water park considerably tumbled to just around 9 percent at the end of the period.
Ranked second in 1980 with approximately lower than one-quarters, Castle quickly overtook the other two and reached the highest percentage of visitors in 2010 at nearly 35%. Zoo which had just 10% in the first years of period experienced a fluctuates in the next 30 years to 20%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fascinations over the period of 30 years What stands out from the line graph is t...
^^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ickly overtook the other two and reached the highest percentage of visitors in 20...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70782316479 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.9355824832 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 136.5 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1874153456 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875749484705 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615661286591 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11655394744 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456769681679 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.