The given table illustrates how consumers in 5 different countries spent their money on different items in 2002. Overall the figures in the table varied through the period.

Essay topics:

The given table illustrates how consumers in 5 different countries spent their money on different items in 2002. Overall the figures in the table varied through the period.

The given table illustrates how consumers in 5 different countries spent their money on different items in 2002. Overall the figures in the table varied through the period.
Food, drinks and tobacco spending accounted for the highest percentage in all 5 countries. The consumer spending in Turkey and Ireland are the highest, as they accounted for 32.14% and 28.19% respectively, while the figures in the other 3 countries are under 20%.
Clothing and footwear were in second important position in 5 countries. The percentage of expenditure were about 5% to 6.5%, except for Italy with 9%.
The amount of money spent on leisure/education was less than on it on 2 categories above. In Turkey, it accounted for 4.35% meanwhile the figures in the others 4 countries were all under 4%.
It is clear to point out that people in those countries spent on food, drinks and tobacco much more than the other 2 items mentioned in the chart.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-02-09 dttt849200 73 view
Essays by user dttt849200 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Turkey, it accounted for 4.35% meanwhile the figures in the others 4 countries we...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93670886076 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78892101642 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3769948916 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39211741475 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172875072034 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.255797843253 0.0843802449381 303% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247858309257 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.377626111755 0.0819641961636 461% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.