The supplied graph outlines informations how water was globally used over hundred years in agriculture, industrial use and domestic use, when given table depicts its consumption in Brazil and Congo in 2000.
It is obviously seen from the graph, that all ways of water use had an increasing trend. However, water used for farming had steady and increasing tendency till 1950 (about 1100 square kilometres), followed with surged increase to about 3000 square kilometres in 2000. Industrial and domestic use experienced almost similar steady trend from initiation roughly 100 square kilometres in 1900 to about 1200 km2 and about 500km2 respectively at the end of the period.
Getting back to the details given in the table, Brazilians consumed significantly more water per person than people from Democratic Republic of Congo (259 cubic metres, 8 cubic metres). It could be noticed that irrigated land was enourmously bigger in Brazil than in Democratic Republic of Congo, 26500 square kilometres and 100 square kilometres respectively.
- Some people think that wild animals should not be kept in zoos. Others believe that there are good reasons for having zoos.discuss both these views and give your opinion. 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should begin learning a foreign language as soon as they start school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. 73
- Living in big cities has a negative effect on people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poo 56
- Some people believe bicycle have a lot of advantages, while others believe bicycle have more disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: ALL_WAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'always'?
Suggestion: always
... is obviously seen from the graph, that all ways of water use had an increasing trend. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he graph, that all ways of water use had an increasing trend. However, water used...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37654320988 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77438063875 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648148148148 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.1080335654 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.166666667 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205645937516 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106220069135 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774025877431 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145175102005 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854001409894 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.