The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water
The charts illustrate the alterations and differences in the number 3 sectors of global water use: Agriculture, industrial and domestic used over the period from 1990 to 2000; and water usage in Brazil and Congo in 2000.
It is clear that global water consumptions significantly increased between 1990 and 2000, and that agriculture accounted for the largest proportion of water used. The research also documented that water consumption in Brazil was considerably higher than in Congo.
In 1990, the water usage in agriculture worldwide stood at around 500, while the figures for industrial and domestic water consumption just about one-fifth of that amount. By 2000, global water use had rapidly and dramatically risen to 3000, the industrial water use had increased just about haft of that amount and domestic consumption had reached to the peak at 500.
In 2000, <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Brazil's </span>population was 176 million, takes 32 times as many as Congo’s water consumption. While the water consumption per person in Brazil was 359, takes 44 times as many as Congo’s. This might due to the fact that Congo had 265 times lesser irrigated land.
In conclusion, the research experienced an increase in the number of all 3 sectors of global water consumption from 1990 to 2000, and the larger proportion in Brazil water use compared to Congo in 2000
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- the table gives information about underground railway systems in 6 cities 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway system in six cities 82
- More and more people buy a wide range of household goods like television microwave oven and rice cooker Do you think this is positive or negative development 73
- Some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them.Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given specialtreatment. Discuss both views and give your opinion ? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30316742081 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35008519007 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497737556561 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5706816002 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.222222222 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269413048137 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134210123713 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728032265618 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175906824898 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638395859084 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.