The line graph depicts the information about global water utilisation for different purposes namely agriculture, industrial and domestic and the table chart shows the water consumed by Brazil and Congo in the year 2000.
It is quite evident from the line graph that maximum global water is utilized for agriculture sector which was intially 5000km square in 1900 and after that water consumption for the same sector increased gradually and reached 3000 km by the year 2000. The worldwide usage of water for industrial and domestic sector followed the similar pattern till the year 1950 and it was almost negligible. After the year 1950 the industries and domestic sector used more water and it reached 1100 and 300 km respectively by the year 2000.
From the table graph, it is clear that the brazil population (176million) consumed more water than congo people (5.2 million) and the water consumption for irrigating land (26500km square) and per person (359 m)was also more in brazil than congo where water consumed for irrigation and per person was 100km square and 8m respectively.
Overall, it is lucid that more water is used for agriculture worldwide and brazil consumed more water than congo.
- the graph below shows the quantity of goods transported in the uk between 1974 and 2002. 67
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 67
- The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand. 67
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by Brazil and Congo in the year 2000. It is quite evident from the line graph ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09644670051 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50355206442 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46192893401 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.9021665625 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.333333333 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8333333333 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293990821749 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169955845979 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657125686226 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208725311751 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508649007642 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.