The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand.

The given line graph illustrates the various types of finances, namely- rates revenue, user charges, borrowings and grants and subsidies from 2012 to present and also gives projections upto 2022 for a local organisation in New Zealand.

A cursory glance at the graph is enough to make it clear that rates revenue and user charges followed a similar trend from 2013 to present and It is projected that it will also follow a similar trend upto 2022. The rates revenue and user charges revenue stood at 1400 and 1000 million dollars in 2012 after which the former finances decreased slightly and the latter increased slowly till the year 2013. From 2013 to present, both the finances increased considerably till the present and it is expected that it will further increase significantly and will reach its peak position at 2400 and 2000 million dollars respectively.

Further scrutinising the chart, it is evident that finances for borrowing remained at same level from 2012 to 2019. Although, there was some fluctuations noticed in between.whereas, it is projected that from 2019, the finances for borrowing will rose sharply and will reach its all time high of 1400 million dollars by 2020. After that there will be sharp fall in the finances till the year 2021 and will reach at 800 million dollars and it is forecast to remain constant till 2022. The grants and subsidies witnessed at 400 million dollars in 2012 and it will reach at 500 million by the year 2022 with small flucatuations from 2015 to 2017.

Overall, it is lucid that maximum finances were rates revenue in the past and it will remain in the future.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rates'' or 'rate's'?
Suggestion: rates'; rate's
...o follow a similar trend upto 2022. The rates revenue and user charges revenue stood ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
... 2000 million dollars respectively. Further scrutinising the chart, it is evident t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'rise'
Suggestion: rise
...m 2019, the finances for borrowing will rose sharply and will reach its all time hig...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89855072464 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55774519675 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467391304348 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.6093771771 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.222222222 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160633521265 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077296997369 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726394720412 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124409116318 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800157114268 0.0819641961636 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.