The pie charts and column graph illustrates the total value of fish in dollars and various sources of fish namely Canada,China and Others who imported the fish to the America from 1988 to 2000.
A cursory glance at the table graph is enough to make it clear that the fish were most popular in 2000 with value of 10.72 billion dollars whereas the least value was seen in 1988 which accounted for 6.57 billion dollars. In the 1992, the value of fish was 8.52 billion dollars.
From the pie charts, it can be noticed that in 1988, the category named as others was the biggest importer of fish with 60% whereas Canada imported the just over a quarter of fish. The proportion of imported fish from China was 13%. In1992, the China and Others lost popularity in importing fish while Canada gained popularity by just under a half of the total proportion. The popular source of importing fish in 2000 was Canada with 42%, although it lost popularity by 4% from the year 1992. The China and others imported the almost similar proportion of fish which was 30% and 28% respectively.
Overall, it is lucid that Canada and China gained popularity in importing fish with the increasing time and maximum value of fish was witnessed in 2000.
- The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand. 67
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
- the graph below shows the quantity of goods transported in the uk between 1974 and 2002. 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , China
...nd various sources of fish namely Canada,China and Others who imported the fish to the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69124423963 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33214328683 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460829493088 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4445557781 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.111111111 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313236501986 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159682330157 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835335954322 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231643701056 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855582513479 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.