The graph and table below show the number of fishers in millions for different regions in 1980, 1990, and 2000, and the world's top exporters of fish in 2000.
The bar chart compares the number of fishers in five continents between 1980 and 2000, and the table shows the ten highest ranking fish exporting countries in 2000.
Overall, Asia had the highest number of fishers in all three years - 1980, 1990, and 2000, and Thailand, an Asian country, became the top fish exporter in 2000.
In 1980, the number of fishermen from Asia was 9 million, which was just three times higher than that of other countries. By 2000, however, the population of fishers in Asia had become 23 million, making it the region with eight times greater than others in the number of fishermen. By contrast, only marginal increases occurred in the figures for the other four continents, from 2 million to 3 million.
Turning to the table, it can be seen that the fish market was also dominated by Asin countries with Thailand ranking first, and China, Taiwan, Russia, Indonesia, and Korea being fourth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth respectively. However, the second and fifth places were taken by two European countries, Norway and Denmark, while the third and sixth spots on the table were occupied by two countries in North America, the USA, and Canada.
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The graph and table below show the number of fishers in millions for different regions in 1980 1990 and 2000 and the world s top exporters of fish in 2000 84
- The two graphs below show the percentage of smokers and the consumption of alcohol in litres in selected countries for the period 1960 2000 78
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95477386935 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3860217937 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613065326633 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.8245661763 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359745422255 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161784443564 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134999637287 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234589936432 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136816173031 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.