The graph below campares figures for production and consumptiin of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts the figures of 2025.
The provided graph shows contrast between the amount of energy prduction and consumption from 1950 to 2000, as well as the prediction of 2025. Energy is callibrated in units where 1 unit is equal to 1 quadrillion of British thermal units.
Overall, the trend of energy production is lower than consumption during all the years mentioned above. Moreover, US imported energy to fulfil their desired consumption.
It is interesting to notice, In 1950 the production and consumption of energy was same which was marginally about 25. The amount of energy production and consumption gradually risen upto about 60 and 65 respectively.
In addition to this, since the amount of energy consumption is more than the energy produced, therfore, after 1975 US started using the imported energy. Till 2000 the difference between prduced and consumed energy bradened, and it is predicted that future as well the difference will further broden till 2025 for produced energy and consumed energy(about 85 and around 135 respectively).
- These days it is much easier for many people to travel to different countries for tourism than in the past Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some people think that children should learn how to compete but others think that children should be taught to cooperate to become more useful adults Express some reasons for both views and give your own opinion 78
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 78
- The diagram below shows some principles of house design for cool and for warm climates. 78
- Blood sports have become a hot topic for debate in recent years. As society develops it is increasingly seen as an uncivilized activity and cruel to the helpless animals that are killed. Blood sports should be banned. to what extent do you agree or disagr 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32098765432 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90606375075 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7519633104 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256350658734 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110447737652 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674494013382 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152188371119 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422001410275 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.