The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts the figures of 2025.
The considering graph chart reveals the data about the figures of producing and usage of energy during the year 1950 to 2000 by US, and it also estimate the level of 2025. The data is recognized in units and which is simple and logical representation.
Basically, it is observed that the maximum consumption of energy during the year 2000 on the other hand, the topmost production was in 2000.
To begin with, in year 1950 the production and consumption of energy had remained same at 25 units. Moving ahead, in year 1975 the 65 units of energy had been producing as well as consumption of the energy 70 units during the year 1975. Moving forward, during the year 1975 to 2000 arise some fluctuations but in year 2000 the usage of energy had stand at 100 units but as well as the production in year 2000 had been 75 units. Furthermore, the prediction of the year 2025 will have consume 150 units of energy by UK, and the production of the energy will 90 units in UK.
In addition to this, the trend was concerned in between the consumption and production the next level during the year . As a result, the usage of energy was more as compared to its production. Therefore, the UK import the 25 units of energy for satisfied thr usage of mankind. The maximum gap show in year 2000 between the both aspects like: consumption and production.
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work qre being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? It is a negative or positive development. 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the production of the silk cloth. 56
- The chart shows the sports played in Australia in 2003 All figures in percentage 79
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reason behind the issue? 61
- The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts the figures of 2025. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'estimates'?
Suggestion: estimates
...he year 1950 to 2000 by US, and it also estimate the level of 2025. The data is recogniz...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...year 2000 on the other hand, the topmost production was in 2000. To begin with...
^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'consumed'.
Suggestion: consumed
...e prediction of the year 2025 will have consume 150 units of energy by UK, and the prod...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...roduction the next level during the year . As a result, the usage of energy was mo...
^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... a result, the usage of energy was more as compared to its production. Therefore,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, therefore, well, in addition, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58506224066 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57966770579 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435684647303 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3006547258 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.454545455 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 5.23603664747 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287684384162 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118367255808 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811002711544 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188650030192 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437938901059 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.