The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of world during the 1990.
The given circular diagram highlight the information about the main reasons of agricultural land become less productive by the causes affected three regions during the 1990. The data is calebroted in per centum.
It can be seen that the three main causes of degradation such as : over-cultivation was 28% , overgrazing was 35% , and deforestation 30% , 7% other effect the land during the year 1990. Furthermore , the witness of here was the north America and Europe. In North America total land degradation was 5% , the reason of deforestation was 0.2% , over-cultivation was 3.3% , and the overgrazing was 1.5 effects , on the other hand in Europe the total land degradation was 23% , the deforestation was 9.8% , 7.7% was over-cultivation , and 1.5% was overgarzing effect respectively.
As far as trend was concerned , in the oceania the total land degrated was 13%. The 1.7% was the reason of deforestation , 11.3% was by the overgarzing but the nill effect by the over-cultivation.
Overall , it is evident that the maximum land degradated in Europe , but the least land was degradated in North America by the three main causes.
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the saftey of other products. Some people are argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour 67
- Some people believe that playing a musical instrument can be beneficial in many different ways Others think it is a waste of time to play a musical instrument Discuss both views and give your own opinion 42
- One should only use enough money to fulfill their needs and rest should gives to needy. To what extent you agree and disagree? 61
- The diagram show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes. 67
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the production of the silk cloth. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ation such as : over-cultivation was 28% , overgrazing was 35% , and deforestation...
^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ultivation was 28% , overgrazing was 35% , and deforestation 30% , 7% other effect...
^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rgrazing was 35% , and deforestation 30% , 7% other effect the land during the yea...
^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e land during the year 1990. Furthermore , the witness of here was the north Ameri...
^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...th America total land degradation was 5% , the reason of deforestation was 0.2% , ...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...% , the reason of deforestation was 0.2% , over-cultivation was 3.3% , and the ove...
^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion was 0.2% , over-cultivation was 3.3% , and the overgrazing was 1.5 effects , o...
^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...3% , and the overgrazing was 1.5 effects , on the other hand in Europe the total l...
^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...urope the total land degradation was 23% , the deforestation was 9.8% , 7.7% was o...
^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion was 23% , the deforestation was 9.8% , 7.7% was over-cultivation , and 1.5% wa...
^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion was 9.8% , 7.7% was over-cultivation , and 1.5% was overgarzing effect respect...
^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tively. As far as trend was concerned , in the oceania the total land degrated ...
^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...The 1.7% was the reason of deforestation , 11.3% was by the overgarzing but the ni...
^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...fect by the over-cultivation. Overall , it is evident that the maximum land deg...
^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...at the maximum land degradated in Europe , but the least land was degradated in No...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1978021978 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29995532275 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489010989011 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.8331676605 43.030603864 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 1.69756097561 884% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14465445574 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897663979007 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120499014344 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136406002794 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118009736691 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.