The chart shows how fertility rates varied between China and the USA during a 80-year period from 1920 to 2000.
Generally, the percentage of child birth in both countries followed a downward trend over this period. In comparison with the USA, the birth rates of China were larger in most years, apart from 1935 and 1950, when those of the USA exceeded China’s.
In terms of China, the birth rates fluctuated around 12 percent in the first 20 years before falling sharply to hit a bottom of nearly 5 percent in 1945. Following that, the figures recovered remarkably from 1945 to 1950, peaking at 15 percent in 1950. Since then, the rates of China babies born have fallen gradually to about 7 percent in 2000.
Regarding the USA, the percentage of child birth rose steadily from more than 10 percent in 1920 to 15 percent in 1935, apart from a slight decline of approximately 2 percent between 1925 and 1930. After plummeting to 5 percent in 1940, the figure remained stable in the next 5 years. Although the USA’s birth rates experienced a surge from 1945 to 1950 and reached a spike of 20 percent, the figures dropped gradually during subsequent years, bottoming out at about 2 percent in 2000.
- Some people say that outdoor activities bring benefits to children s development rather than computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 84
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think it is happening How to solve this issue 71
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives Therefore it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...varied between China and the USA during a 80-year period from 1920 to 2000. Gene...
^
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...d a downward trend over this period. In comparison with the USA, the birth rates of China ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, so, then, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72857142857 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44569592783 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.168972269 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262204977348 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122181216094 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946699979001 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196646528486 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655701900598 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.