The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000
A glance at the graph provided manifests the USA and Chinese fertility correspondent of a period from 1920 to 2000. Although there is no dependence of fertility and the period of that time, there is some striking similarities between birth rates of two countries.
Increasing steadily from around 10 percent to 15 percent from 1920 to 1935, Chinese’s fertility faced with marked decline to 5 percent to about 1937. Then it remained without change from 1937 to 1943. In the following, fertility of china experienced an astronomically growth from 5 percent in 1943 to 20 percent in 1948. After that, fertility of china fell to approximately 2 percent in 2000.
About the American fertility, a fluctuation can be seen so that in which the amount of birth rate was confined to a narrow range and varied from about 11 percent in 1920 to 13 percent in 1937. In the continue, the USA fertility came across with V shape change with a minimum of about 5 percent in 1943 as well as with an increase to 15 percent in 1946. In the following, like the Chinese fertility , it dropped to 7 percent in 2000.
It is interesting to note that while in the incipient year, 1920, the discrepancy between two countries birth rates was a few, in the 2000 it was at least five times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industries to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people say there is no need for print newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- This tables show data about the amount of television watched by children in different countries hours per day and also the average academic achievement of people in these countries of people completing each level 79
- The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in Australia between 1992-2000.Summaries the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate. 100
- Some people think having more TV channels is good because they will have more choices While other people think too many TV channels only lead to a lot of poor quality TV programs Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and in 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('astronomically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...llowing, fertility of china experienced an astronomically growth from 5 percent in 1943 to 20 percent in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rcent in 1920 to 13 percent in 1937. In the continue, the USA fertility came across with V s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he following, like the Chinese fertility , it dropped to 7 percent in 2000. It ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, well, while, at least, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68303571429 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81549855244 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508928571429 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.094897664 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226544343427 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100718144032 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590001422056 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160989449774 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635906163826 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.