The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
The line chart illustrates how the birth rates of two different countries changed from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the birth rates of both nations experienced a similar downwards trend over the a period of 80 years. However, there was a higher proportion was seen in the USA in most years.
From 1920 to 1935, the birth rate of the USA saw a fluctuation although it always remained above 10%. Fifteen years later, the figure decreased dramatically to below that point and then increased significantly to reach the a peak of 15% in 1950. Throughout the remaining years, the birth rate in the USA fell rapidly by over 8%, falling to approximately 7% by 2000.
Over the same period, the birth rate of China varied more significantly than the US did. It dropped to 5% from 1940 to 1945 before rising to 20%, which was the highest point of the whole diagram. By contrast, afterwards, there was a considerable decline in China’s data to about 2% in 2000, which was 5% less than that of the US.
- the graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 67
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time. 78
- Due to human activities on land and in the sea, he animals are becoming extinct. What are the reasons and Solutions? 89
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...erienced a similar downwards trend over the a period of 80 years. However, there was ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...d then increased significantly to reach the a peak of 15% in 1950. Throughout the rem...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67222222222 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67920086667 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.751685049 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307987221735 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121397498737 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085966923447 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183811435418 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763757518023 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.