The graph below depicts the percentage change in average house prices in five cities from 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989.
The diagram illustrates how many changes (in percentages) of average house prices were separated into five different cities between 1990 and 2002 in comparison to the year of 1989. It is immediately apparent that all cities’ figure witnessed an upward trend relatively in average house prices, except Frankfurt (Germany), during over 12-year period.
Regarding the price of houses from 1990 to 1995, it is clearly seen that Tokyo, London, and New York (USA) experienced a similar change. While the two formers declined significantly by about 8% -the greatest proportion change in average house prices- for each, the latter saw a noticeable decrease by around 5% during this period. Then, the exception was for Madrid and Frankfurt which increased slightly of roughly 2s % -the smallest percentage in this section.
Turning to the house cost six years later, there was a dramatic increase, rising by nearly 20% during the year of 1996 to 2002. Likewise, the timeframe witnessed a slight growth in the percentage change of house price in New York (USA), Madrid, and Tokyo, reaching of 5%, 2%, and 2% respectively. However, Frankfurt saw a gradual dropped to 0.5% at the end of the period.
- The bar chart below shows information about water use worldwide (Km3) from three different sectors between 1910 and 2010. 84
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What are the solutions 44
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 73
- The consumption of the world’s resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions? 78
- The bar graph below depicts information about the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '-the the greatest'.
Suggestion: -the the greatest
...mers declined significantly by about 8% -the greatest proportion change in average house pric...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '-the the smallest'.
Suggestion: -the the smallest
...hich increased slightly of roughly 2s % -the smallest percentage in this section. Turning t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, regarding, so, then, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11855670103 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71676800673 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659793814433 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6502103781 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.125 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301179455358 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121809637882 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108811320376 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203773740931 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749392882383 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.