The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.

Submitted by ntv2996 on Sat, 10/15/2022 - 14:09

The given chart reveals the statistics of energy usage in the USA since 1980 with some predictions until 2030 through many different types of energy. Overall, there is a wide disparity in comsumption levels of fossil energy and renewable energy.
Regarding the group of sustainable energy, all three figure stood at 3 quadrillion unit at the beginning and slight increased to about 5 quadrillion through the next decade. For the rest time scale, hydropower and solar usage level registered an wild fluctuations, contrary to the upward trend in nuclear energy consumption.
Concerning the group of fossil energy, it seem that this is the dominant source of energy in all the timelines. Accordingly, the statistic for coal, natural gas and petrol stood at 16,20 and 35 quadrililion unit, respectively. As an evident from the graph, while the coal usages kept rising and did not manifest any sign of decrease, that of the petrol usage and natural gas usage recorded opposite pattern. More detail, the period from 1980 to 2000 witnessed some slack in both categories but returned to its main trend afterward.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-21 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-06-19 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-06-19 Giang Tran 73 view
2023-12-17 neverlandforestcat 67 view
2023-12-10 brew 78 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cs of energy usage in the USA since 1980 with some predictions until 2030 through...
^^
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ith some predictions until 2030 through many different types of energy. Overall, there is a wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...opower and solar usage level registered an wild fluctuations, contrary to the upwa...
^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'fluctuation'?
Suggestion: fluctuation
...nd solar usage level registered an wild fluctuations, contrary to the upward trend in nuclea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rd trend in nuclear energy consumption. Concerning the group of fossil energy, i...
^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...ncerning the group of fossil energy, it seem that this is the dominant source of ene...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, regarding, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11602209945 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75260129597 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657458563536 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8270706108 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153572539601 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618588894601 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711729684442 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108563824186 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074215806472 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cs of energy usage in the USA since 1980 with some predictions until 2030 through...
^^
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ith some predictions until 2030 through many different types of energy. Overall, there is a wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...opower and solar usage level registered an wild fluctuations, contrary to the upwa...
^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'fluctuation'?
Suggestion: fluctuation
...nd solar usage level registered an wild fluctuations, contrary to the upward trend in nuclea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rd trend in nuclear energy consumption. Concerning the group of fossil energy, i...
^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...ncerning the group of fossil energy, it seem that this is the dominant source of ene...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, regarding, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11602209945 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75260129597 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657458563536 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8270706108 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153572539601 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618588894601 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711729684442 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108563824186 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074215806472 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.