The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provides changes in energy consumption in the US from 1980 to 2018, and anticipated consumption to 2030.
It is noticeable that the US will continue to reply on fossil fuels, while nuclear and natural energy sources remain relatively unimportant.
In 1980, petrol and oil reached the highest level in energy consumption with 35 quadrillion (35q) units, the figure continued to increase significantly to approximately 40q in 2018 before being expected to reach a peak of about 47q in 2030. At the same time,starting relatively high at just over 15q and 20q respectively in 1980, and then the amount of coal and natural gas fluctuated considerably by roughly 15q between 1985 and 2018. After that, it is projected that the figure of coal will rise rapidly to just under 30q in 2030, where as the forecast for natural gas consumption will be unchanged and stop at about 27q until 2030.
On the other hand, the amount of nuclear and sustainable energy were used around 4q in the year 1980, and the data oscillated slightly by 10q over 25 years. In addition, there will be an minimal increse in consumption of nuclear and solar/wind energy at about 7q after staying constant until 2025. Conversely, hydropower energy consumed is likely to be no change to 2030.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-30 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
2019-12-06 | Leeinho | 73 | view |
2019-11-22 | Moustafa Nofale | 78 | view |
2019-10-29 | nhaxquyeen | 89 | view |
2019-09-07 | wardiati | 61 | view |
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 61
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , starting
...k of about 47q in 2030. At the same time,starting relatively high at just over 15q and 20...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...rise rapidly to just under 30q in 2030, where as the forecast for natural gas consumptio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...er 25 years. In addition, there will be an minimal increse in consumption of nucle...
^^
Line 4, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umed is likely to be no change to 2030.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, so, then, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80197791692 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587962962963 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3341235568 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18424295377 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859173522232 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588889694368 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118059179844 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650447198587 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.