The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101.
The given line graph not only illustrates the evolution in the birth and death rate in New Zealand since 1901 up to now, but also gives projection till the year 2101.
Initially in 1901, the death rate in New Zealand was just over 20 per thousand, which was doubled the figure for death rate, with below 10 per thousand. Over the next century, after many oscillations in the number of both birth and death, the birth rate, by 2001, had gone through a period of consistently increase to approximately 60 per thousand, exceeding the number in deaths, which had only around 30 per thousand. Since then, while the birth rate has kept on slightly decreasing, a noticeable go up has been witnessed in death rate.
According to the prediction, in comparison with the number of births, which is estimated to go down steadily to over 40 per thousand, the death rate will have been accounted for almost 60 per thousand by the year 2101.
All things considered, the number of deaths will probably overtake the figure for birth rate in the near future and the tremendous gap between two levels is forecasted to be reserved for a long time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gives projection till the year 2101. Initially in 1901, the death rate in New...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o up has been witnessed in death rate. According to the prediction, in comparis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost 60 per thousand by the year 2101. All things considered, the number of dea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70351758794 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54514551902 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9087674648 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1666666667 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312318180511 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171654997141 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987632244558 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196735620041 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110773148106 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.