The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101.
Summarize the facts by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph represents the proportion of the new-born and the decease in New Zealand over the period 200 years, with the prediction to 2101.
It can be concluded from the graph is that the percentage of births in New Zealand experienced a sharp oscillation over the period shown. Whilst, the rate of New Zealand’s people who passed away climbed dramatically from 1901 to 2101.
In 1901, the number of newly borned babies in New Zealand witnessed twice as high as the death people. This took up about 20% before rocketing in 60 years later and hit a low of 66% in 1961. After declining moderately and having slight roar from 1981 to 2001, the birth population fell again during the present year of 2021.
Turning to the future stage, the ratio of dead people in New Zealand makes up the same percentage as the birth rate in 2041, but Later surges and overtakes the figure for new-born babies until the end of the project stage. In contrast, the proportion of new individuals is likely to plunge minimally between 2021 and 2101.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-12 | minhtran224 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-12 | minhtran224 | 78 | view |
- the graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000
- Solving environment problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process for building purposes Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 Summarize the inforation by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6978021978 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45306749849 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598901098901 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7183542767 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218659841861 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964722012856 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439701088607 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134542484343 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291818887703 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.