The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries: USA, France, Egypt, Malaysia, Brazil
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
<span id="docs-internal-guid-b310fa74-7fff-b5d3-42e7-efb9906fa840"><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">The given line graph provides information from the research into the number of foreign tourists in five different nations over a 15-year period between 1995 and 2010. Units are measured by millions people.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">Overall, according to the data, America was the most attractive destination and all mentioned countries had growing tendency of visitor number.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">To be specific, America prevailed upon other counterparts over the period. In 1995, there were more than 70 millions foreigners came to USA. This number rose gradually in 10 years, reached its peak at just above 90 millions in 2005 and finally fall insignificantly by approximate 3 millions in 2010. In addition, France welcomed nearly 90 millions visitors during 2010, which was nearly three times as much as it had in 1995. </span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">Turning to the other countries, both Malaysia and Egypt followed similar patterns. The number of international tourists arrived these nations increased gradually over years and in 2010 they all had their figures doubled compared to the 1995 statistic. Meanwhile, the number for Brazil increased by just a mere 2 millions after 15 years the survey taken.</span></p><div><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;"><br></span></div></span>
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U S from 1960 to 2011 Unit is measured in million tons and the percent recycling on total trash produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 89
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2401.0 965.302439024 249% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 8.95895522388 4.92477711251 182% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 10.9271539155 2.65546596893 411% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544776119403 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 283.868780488 207% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.2 1.45097560976 152% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 261.238182039 43.030603864 607% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 343.0 112.824112599 304% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 38.2857142857 22.9334400587 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0293995212702 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.02636646671 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262325526096 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0293995212702 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 39.9 13.2329268293 302% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -17.85 61.2550243902 -29% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 18.2 6.51609756098 279% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.2 10.3012195122 245% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 35.28 11.4140731707 309% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 39.0 11.4329268293 341% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.