The graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.
The graph indicates how many people visited three London Museums in the year 2013, between June and September month. Overall, most visitors went to British museum compared to science and natural history museum. About 750 people visited British museum in July which is the highest while least went to science museum in the month of August.
In detail, Around 600 people visited British Museum in June and increased dramatically to approximately 750 in July. The number slip back to 500 in August and rose gradually to about 650 in September. Despite of fluctuations the number followed increasing trend at the end of period.
By contrast, Science and Natural History Museums followed decreasing trend at starting, however the value increased at the end of period. The number of people who visited Science Museum fell gradually to below 300 from 400 then it rose substantially in September. Likewise, Natural History Museum, there was a sharp drop in visitors from June to July. The number remained steadily in August and then increased consistently to 500 in September.
- The chart below shows the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English ,in 2000 and 2010. 61
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 56
- The graph below shows the reported number of cases of influenza in people over 65 in a certain village in the UK from 1985 to 1995 56
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 56
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20114942529 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63264188156 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.5501918149 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.5 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292595081166 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117452287963 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953329954476 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194578623472 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827816853893 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.