The graph below gives information about ownership of computers as percentGe of population from 2002 to 2010 as well as their level of education
The bar charts show data about the computer ownership, with a further classification by level of education over a eight year period from 2002 to 2010.
Overall, there is an upward trend in ownership of computer over the complete time period as well as with the level of education.
It is clearly evident from the first graph that there is a steady but significant increase in the computer ownership over the period. At the beginning of the period, just more than half of the population owned computers and surprisingly by the end of the period three out of four people had a home computer.
Analysis of the data from the second chart represents that, with the increase in level of education, there is a correspondent rise in the computer ownership. In 2002, 15% of the computers were owned by candidates with no high school diploma, while in 2010 the figure rose sharply to 40%. There was approximately 30 percentage points difference in computer ownership in case of high school graduates, with 35% in 2002 to 79% and unfinished college students (60% to 90%). The graduates and postgraduates had higher ownership of computers accounting to 85% and 95% percent respectively in 2010. There is only 20 percentage points difference in these two categories from 2002to 2010.
To sum up, there is substantial rise in the computer ownership throughout the period and the candidates with higher level of education owned computers to a larger extent
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
- the bar chart shows the hours per week the teenagers spend doing certain activities from 2002 to 2007 73
- It seems clear that obesity in today’s society is to some extent due to theavailability of fast food. Should governments place a tax on fast food to reducethe amount of fast food consumed? 61
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- heating fuel choice according to year of costruction 69
- Disagreement leads to stress and reduces learning 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...assification by level of education over a eight year period from 2002 to 2010. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, well, while, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0329218107 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87318253912 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9377059157 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327567176923 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140258467963 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652567980608 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195449168831 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05803556467 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.