The graph below shows the acid level in mouth from consumption of sugar and honey. Eating sweet food produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay.
The given line graph revels the information about the change in acidity of the mouth after the consumption of sweet products like fruit sugar, cane sugar and honey as acid inside the mouth lead to tooth decay.
It can be seen that after consumption of sweet products within 5 minutes there is dramatically decline in the PH value of mouth. Cane sugar has the maximum acidity with PH of 3.5, following by fruit sugar of PH 4.25 and honey at 4.85 PH level. In addition to this, both cane sugar and fruit sugar shows the similar trend. Fruit sugar has reached to amphoteric state after 34 minutes, whereas cane sugar has reached after 40 minutes. Moreover, fruit sugar and cane sugar cross the barrer of PH for tooth decay after 19 and 32 minutes respectively.
Moving further, there has been stability in PH value of mouth from 5 minute to 10 minute after consumption of honey. Apart from this, there is sharp rise in PH value cross the danger zone of tooth decay after 13 minutes and has reached to normal PH value of mouth after 25 minutes.
Overall, it is evident that there is drop in PH value of mouth after consumption of sweet product and acidity become normal after some time, but cane sugar consume maximum time on the other hand, honey takes the least time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-29 | KrishMahajan | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-04 | roopdeep | 61 | view |
- The birth rate in most developed countries is predicted to begin to fall over the next 50 years. By 2030 it is estimated that over one third of population in most developed countries will be aged 65 at more.What effects will those prediction have on devel 73
- Some people say that only reason for learning a foreign language is inorder to travel to or work in foreign country. Other said that there are not the only reason why some one should learn a foreign language. Discuss both the views and give your opinion o 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six area of world. 67
- The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 67
- The chart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, whereas, apart from, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59210526316 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20112086363 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478070175439 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2072625364 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302325191436 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153258759334 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974894764227 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230246275391 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106093975822 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.