The graph below shows the amount of fruit purchased annually by a large supermarket chain in India.
The line chart illustrates how much fruit bought per year by a big chain supermarket such as apples, oranges, pears, and bananas in India. Units are measured in million tonnes.
Overall, amongst the four categories purchased that increased, oranges stayed relatively stable throughout the year.
The majority of fruit being bought annually was on apples which accounted for 70million tonnes from 1988 and continued to rose significantly its figure to just above 90million tonnes in 2016. While pears made it to the bottom with a recorded data of approximately 5million tonnes, however, it slowly moving up and reached a peak just above a fifth million tonnes.
Meanwhile, bananas and oranges both had its figure from around 40million tonnes in the beginning. After 4 years, bananas suddenly rose to nearly 60million tonnes whereas oranges declined to 22million tonnes with fluctuations year on year and stayed the same in 2016, while the former fruit marked on the second rank with a supported data just above 90million tonnes in the end year.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- The chart below indicates the primary uses of Internet in Japan in the years 1995 to 2005. 73
- The charts below show the average spending for British in 1971 and 2001. 78
- The graphs below shows the average CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Portugal and Italy from 1967 to 2007 89
- The chart shows the amount of waste production by British households since 1990 with predictions until 2030. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The line chart illustrates how much fruit bought per year by a big chain su...
^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...bananas in India. Units are measured in million tonnes. Overall, amongst the four ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... relatively stable throughout the year. The majority of fruit being bought annua...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21893491124 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59800377456 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639053254438 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.623715697 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0935687702154 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429758931818 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562400505311 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649103231676 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506714750387 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.