The line graph compares three companies in terms of the waste they produced between 2000 and 2015.
It is clear that the volume of waste produced by company A increased constantly over the period shown. Company B as well as company C produced less and less waste during this period.
In 2000, company A created around 12 tones of waste, compared with company B and company C which produced around 8 tones and 4 tones respectively. The production of waste by company C increased gradually, reaching over 9 tones in 2015. By contrast, the figure for waste production by company A kept dropping to 3 tones.
A dramatic increase in waste production was seen in both company C and company A from 2000 to 2005, with the amount of waste produced by company B reaching a peak of approximately 10 tones and the figure for company C rising to 6 tones. However, the waste that company B produced immediately saw a considerate decline after 2005 and dramatically fell to 3 tones.
- Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- Some people believe that the best way to build a happier society is to ensure that there are only small differences between the richest and the poorest members To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...as seen in both company C and company A from 2000 to 2005, with the amount of waste ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7134502924 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76912780628 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485380116959 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7825212038 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365825439165 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197449733633 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679201577527 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258408050151 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548634488653 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.