The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The provided line graph illustrates the information regarding average carbon dioxide emissions for individually, measured in metric tonnes, in four different countries, namely, the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal, over a 40 years period, from 1967 to 2007.
As an overall trend, the data of the UK and Sweden countries have fallen, while Italy and Portugal’s features experienced a converse trend.
In 1967, the amount of carbon dioxide emission was just below 12 the UK, in contrast Sweden’s figure demonstrated just above 8 metric tonnes. After 10 years, the first country started to decline gradually and another one reached to zenith, approximately at 11 metric tonnes. Followed by, the former had a moderate fall, while the latter plummeted dramatically by 2007. Thus, the United Kingdom’s indication reached, at around 9, although, Sweden experienced a minimum trend, at about 5 metric tonnes.
Conversely, Italy and Portugal’s tendency conveyed approximately at 4 and 1 metric tonnes, respectively, at the beginning. However, both countries had significant increases for the next 20 years. Afterwards, between 1997 and 2007, Italy’s figure stagnated almost at 8 and Portugal’s trend showed a slight increase, which was lower at around 2 metric tonnes than Italy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-28 | Fay Phan Nguyen | 87 | view |
| 2021-01-19 | chargedbyfaith | 73 | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 84
- The Graph shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The provided line graph illustrates the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, regarding, thus, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54314720812 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03717932369 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675126903553 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1302124744 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246828930762 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918551704278 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791085126174 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148092410113 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058089886627 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The provided line graph illustrates the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, regarding, thus, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54314720812 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03717932369 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675126903553 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1302124744 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246828930762 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918551704278 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791085126174 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148092410113 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058089886627 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.