The graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The graph depicts information about the emissions of carbon dioxide per person in four countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, the emerging fact from the line graph is that although the Uk and Sweden were produced more co2 per capita, the output was decreased over the period. Meanwhile, the proportion of co2 rose significantly in Uk and Portugal.
Looking at more details, in 1967, the people in the United Kingdom were the biggest polluter, which was responsible for 11 metric tonnes each. Likewise, the next highest emitters were seeded, with almost 9 metric tonnes each, which was double the value of average Italian, and six-time more than individuals in Portugal. Afterwards, the output of Carbon dioxide fell steadily in the UK over the next four decades, and despite a surge in the year 1977, people in Sweden also cut their co2 emissions dramatically until by 2007.
By contrast, after 1967, emissions increased in Italy and Portugal. At the end of the year, Italy became a second-highest polluter, with almost 8 metric tonnes.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- The bar chart shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education 84
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 89
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in some land 89
- Many people believe that education and high qualification will bring success Others think that it is not required to achieve success in life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04651162791 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64352735655 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0471837627 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293309603586 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122972285718 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966084932836 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183790210194 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919638622048 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.