The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph illustrates changes in the annual per capita CO2 emissions in four countries between 1967 and 2007.
It can be observed that CO2emissions per person in Great Britain were highest in the 4 decades even though a fall of almost 4%, from approximately 11% to approximately 7%, was recorded in the quoted period.
Similarly, Sweden also registered a fall in the corresponding period, from around 9% to 5% , though it initially saw a spike of around 1.5% from 1967 to 1977. From 1977 onwards, the decline in emissions was drastic, and Sweden was surpassed by Italy in 1987. In 2007, carbon emission of this country was at par with Portugal.
On the other hand, Italy and Portugal witnessed a rise in the carbon discharge in the corresponding time frame. The pattern of rise in both the countries was almost identical even though the difference in emissions was more than 2% between Italy, above 4%, and Portugal, 1%.
The rise was constant in both the nations.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 200 and 2010 72
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 56
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 56
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rresponding period, from around 9% to 5% , though it initially saw a spike of arou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88023952096 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74620305801 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1882394092 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16584371747 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785321255368 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622062625249 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923606332484 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748562997051 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.